Information architecture vs sitemaps
For user experience designers, reducing their role to just visual design is identified as one of the biggest mistakes they can make: design is primarily about solving the problem, not just the solution.
The processes preceding the design of interfaces and graphical experiences are crucial for ensuring the success of the solutions proposed to users, involving not only ideation and research but also definition.
Once we have researched and collected information about our target users, this information will shape and refine the initial ideas to align with the qualitative and quantitative data gathered. This leads us to various considerations to take into account, and in web design, it is also reflected in how we organize and classify information.
Approaches to information classification
There are various approaches to information classification familiar to designers. One term that has recently resonated is the “sitemap”, which refers to the visual representation of a website’s structural architecture, following a specific hierarchy. This provides an overall view of our website, giving the user more conscious and precise navigation.
A sitemap serves as a direct resource to guide users to their content and assist in indexing it in search engines. However, this resource is not the only one we have in the process or product of classifying our website’s information.
Information architecture, on the other hand, is the discipline that names the ordering, organizing, and hierarchizing of web content. Jakob Nielsen refers to it as “the practice of deciding how content is organized and maintained, the relationship between its pieces of content, and the visibility of content displayed in the navigation.”
Principles and techniques of information architecture
There are a series of fundamental principles that guide information architecture:
- Hierarchy: Establishing a clear and logical structure of content.
- Navigation: Creating easy-to-follow paths for users to find what they are looking for.
- Coherence: Maintaining uniformity in the presentation and organization of information.
- Consistency: Ensuring that design and navigation patterns are uniform throughout the site.
- Accessibility: Ensuring that all users, regardless of their abilities, can access the information.
The main consideration of information architecture is to create a logical and intuitive system of navigation and content search that functions with full ease.
Thus, there are a series of resources or techniques developed during the execution of information architecture:
- Content inventory: Identifying and categorizing all the digital content available on a website by tags.
- Content authorship: Evaluating the useful and informative value of current content and taking action to expand, update, or cut content.
- Taxonomic development: Creating the technical and specific vocabulary that serves to control the identified content and classify its contents.
- Information architecture research: Conducting research processes to test the search and navigation capability over the contents we have to structure.
- Structural planning: Mapping and distributing content sections with a specific hierarchy.
The action of information architecture contributes to several benefits for website users. This ensures that interface menus are more intuitive and understandable by users by ensuring the correct cataloging of content in the study, speeds up searches by promoting a more coherent structure, and increases content visibility by improving web content indexing.
For example, if a user searches for information on a specific topic, good information architecture will allow them to find it quickly without having to navigate through multiple unrelated pages.
Key differences between sitemaps and information architecture
Now, with these concepts grounded, what is the main difference between the two?
This question is easily answered if we consider the last resource of information architecture. A sitemap refers to that structural planning, which is just one part of the broader information architecture process.
Creating the structure’s planning is only a part of executing a larger architecture process that will serve as the foundation for the entire website schema.
A sitemap is more tangible and specific, providing a clear visual representation of a website’s structure. It is a useful tool for both developers and users, helping to understand and navigate the site.
The subsequent design process may understand that both processes can grow and modify their main structure based on user research. This is why both processes are similar in scalability and modification capability, unlike other architecture processes that can be difficult to modify.
In summary, while sitemaps offer a clear and direct view of a website’s structure, information architecture encompasses a broader spectrum, including the organization, categorization, and accessibility of content, which is crucial for an optimal user experience.
Both elements, sitemaps and information architecture, are fundamental in web design, each with its own purpose and benefit. While sitemaps provide a clear and useful visual guide for navigation and SEO, information architecture focuses on creating an intuitive and accessible user experience through the logical and coherent organization of content.
Discover our UX training at UX Learn (training in Spanish):
This is a translation of the following article from our corporate website:
