Differences Between In-Person and Online UX Research
When working on user experience research, one of the first decisions we make is the format: in-person, online, or hybrid? The choice is not trivial, as it conditions how we organize the work, how we interact with participants, and what type of results we can obtain.
In this article we share our experience on how logistics and dynamics change in each case, as well as some key points to consider when deciding which modality is most suitable for each project.
Changes in Logistics According to Format
Organizing in-person research usually requires more preparation. We need an adequate space, whether our own or rented, which may include elements such as a one-way mirror. We also have to coordinate travel, align schedules, and anticipate setup and teardown times. For this reason, sessions are often concentrated on intensive days.
See also: What is a UX Lab
In the online context, the process is more flexible. We can expand the call by removing geographical barriers, and distribute sessions over several days. However, the technical part becomes more prominent: good connection, appropriate tools, and planning that ensures fluidity. Something we take great care with is the participant experience, because small technical failures can affect the quality of the study.
Differences in Session Dynamics
Regarding dynamics, in-person face-to-face interaction facilitates a more natural interaction. Communication flows more naturally: we can capture non-verbal nuances such as body language, facial expressions, or small gestures that complement verbal discourse.
Additionally, the shared environment favors the building of trust, which usually translates into greater openness from participants. It is also possible to work more immersively, incorporating collaborative dynamics with physical materials or conducting direct contextual observation when the study requires it.
In the case of online studies, dynamics need to be adapted. Interaction is more limited in gestures, and we must ensure that explanations are clear and activities are well structured to avoid confusion. We tend to simplify tasks and break sessions into shorter blocks to maintain attention and participant comfort.
It is also important to be attentive to digital fatigue: video call sessions generate greater cognitive effort and it is advisable to space out the most demanding moments and encourage an agile and engaging pace.
Tools We Use in Each Case
In-person:
- Audio/video recorders
- Cameras
- Room recording systems (one-way mirror, eye tracking, specific software)
Online:
- Video call platforms (Zoom, Teams, Meet)
- Remote prototyping tools (Figma, InVision)
- Screen and audio recording (Loom, OBS)
What to Consider When Deciding Which Format to Use
There is no single answer. The choice between in-person and online should start from several factors:
- User profile: if there are barriers to attending in person, if they feel more comfortable in their usual environment, etc.
- Type of product or service: some require physical context for use; others are fully digital.
- Research objectives: if the goal is emotional depth or contextual exploration, in-person provides additional nuances; if the goal is broad reach or speed, online is very powerful.
- Budget and available time: in-person logistics require more investment in time and resources.
At the Studio we always carefully evaluate these aspects in each project to define the most appropriate research strategy that provides maximum value, considering the context on each occasion.
This is a translation of the following article from our corporate website:
